UN elects Iran to commission on women’s rights…huh?

The outrage from the Obama whitehouse was…wait, what outrage? Coming from a President who attacks Israel at every turn for building homes in their nation’s capital, I guess this is all too expected.

Consider the case of Soraya M., adapted from a book by French-Iranian journalist Freidoune Sahebjam into a movie that is both terrifying and shocking. The story is a true one, about a woman whose husband wants to divest himself of a marriage so he can paedophilically marry a 14 year old girl. He finds a way when his wife cooks dinner for a neighbor who has lost his wife–charging her with adultery.

In the West we assume most stories end well, justice prevails over evil, but this was not the case for Soraya M, as Sharia law convicted her, buried her to her waist, and she was stoned to death.

Unlike Mr Obama, we cannot foolishly project our values upon other cultures. Iran is not a good place for human rights.

A recent story from FOX details one Iranian Police chief who is threatening to arrest women with suntans.

“In some areas of north Tehran we can see many suntanned women and young girls who look like walking mannequins,” he continued. “We are not going to tolerate this situation and will first warn those found in this manner and then arrest and imprison them.”

You’ve come a long way baby!

I have argued before with people who like to compare us to the world, saying that many members of the U.N. hate the USA. Let them hate us, we have the high ground. Much of the U.N. reminds me of a Star Wars bar scene of various dictators who allow paedophilia, white slavery, the caste system, female genital mutilation, anti-semitism, violation of women’s rights (women as cattle), and outright slavery and genocide.

Yet we are the “bad people”? Personally I could care less about the world’s perception, what worries me is that the President seems to agree with them.

This action by the United Nations should remove all credibility they may have had. It is tantamount to electing Nazi Germany to a commission on Jewish relations.

DreadPirateRoberts

MMA Legend Don Frye not a big Obama Fan

Youtube clip: Don Frye versus Takayama (One of Frye’s most famous battles)

He was in Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) before it was big. He also became a huge fan favorite in Japan under the Pride Fighting Championships. Basically, if you know the legendary toughness attributed to Chuck Norris, then you probably should know Don Frye. With a voice that sounds like dry granite, and a mustache any Cowboy would respect.

Don Frye is a “Man’s man”. And he fears no man, either.

In the above interview, Don is his interesting self as usual, talking about fighting (still), gawking at the girls, and expressing his very American (Conservative) political views.

In an interview by Ariel Helwani, Helwani asks Frye about “Competition” between MMA organizations:

AH: “Do you think it’s good for the sport to have number two competition? Someone threatening the UFC? (Ultimate Fighting Championship)

DF: “Oh hell yeah, competition is what made the USA great…”

Don then goes on to talk about the root of the problem as he see it in America right now:

“We’re a great nation, as long as we don’t go Socialist.”

Helwani doesn’t know what to make of this discussion, but Frye continues, making it pretty clear when the problem started. It was right about the time of the Bailouts under President George Bush, and then Barack Obama was elected and all bets were off.

“We need to stay the course, the way we were several years ago. Now we’re kinda veering off in the wrong direction…Capitalism is what makes the country great.”

Frye, a true character, also seems to know his History, and it is evident in this quote:

“I don’t want to see anything go socialist…it’s a proven failure.”

More a living legend at this point than a man, Don Frye may just live forever.

DreadPirateRoberts

A ticket to ride–to San Francisco

Hot Air talks about the move by San Francisco to ban travel to Arizona by public employees in a recent story.

Eager to burnish the city’s reputation as a Liberal enclave, it seems that Mayor Gaven Newsome quickly jumped at the chance to make a headline. Illegals take note, one of the most friendly sanctuary cities in America toward you is San Francisco.

I have a solution that I think would aid both Arizona, and the illustrious and deteriorating (although beatiful) city of San Francisco:

Give a free one way ticket to any illegal who wants to relocate to San Francisco.

This is a great solution. Think about it, Arizona can reduce it’s problems with illegal immigration, the lawlessness, the high unemployment, the benefit costs, and they can say they are looking out for illegals. After all, if you move to an American safe haven, they don’t have to return to Mexico.

San Francisco can then claim the highest illegal population in America. They can change their city language to Spanish, and staunchly enforce it. Speaking English will become a “no no”. Sure, it will be costly, but considering that Nancy Pelosi is your congressman, just ask her for the money to do it. It is for a worthy cause.

Overnight, San Francisco can become Mexico, and why not?

Right now, illegals already want to leave Arizona. People will not pick up day laborers, for fear of breaking State (which mirrors unenforced Federal) law.

Everyone gets what they want: Arizona residents, who favor the new law, get to rid their state of many problems, while San Francisco can express it’s endless political and Social Liberalism.

I am sure that if a fund is made to help pay for this, the American people will help out these people. Since 60% of Americans support Arizona, a great many will contribute to the “Illegal relocation project”. Sure, a ticket can also be back to Mexico or whatever country of origin if you wish, or to San Francisco.

Let’s make this happen people!

DreadPirateRoberts

Immigration control the Mexican Way

In the recent days since Arizona passed it’s tough new law to enforce it’s border, we have seen:

1. Rioting illegals
2. One documented case of defacing a public building with a refried bean Swastika.
3. Al Sharpton move in and claim that the Arizona law is racism, ignoring that it is poor blacks who are losing their jobs to illegal immigrants.
4. A move by San Francisco, Las Angeles, and one of Arizona’s own Congressman urging a boycott of the state.
5. Mexican President Calderon warning the Mexican people that they might face “intolerance, hate, discrimination and abuse”–oh really?

The Liberal talking points are that any enforcement of our borders or scrutiny of obvious illegal immigrants is racism, violation of civil rights, and just plain not nice.

Michelle Malkin has a remarkable writeup of how Mexico treats non-citizens, and it is a worthy read.

Lets just say that if we treated illegal aliens even half as harshly as Mexico, we would not have a problem at all:

– The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset “the equilibrium of the national demographics. So if there are too many “non-Latino” immigrants, they can tell you to leave? Yes.

– If outsiders do not enhance the country’s “economic or national interests” or are “not found to be physically or mentally healthy,” they are not welcome. Too poor, no visible means of employment? Get out of our country.

– Illegal entry into the country is equivalent to a felony punishable by two years’ imprisonment. Compare this to our “catch and release” program. The worst that an illegal has to face in America is to be sent back to Mexico or their country of origin. And in most “sanctuary cities” illegals are just released back into the USA and asked to return for a trial, which they never do.

– Law enforcement officials at all levels — by national mandate — must cooperate to enforce immigration laws, including illegal alien arrests and deportations. The same as the Arizona law, but the military also can take part. Right now illegal immigrant rights groups and the ACLU are fighting a request for troops on our borders.

– Ready to show your papers? Mexico’s National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. They know who is in their country, period.

Michelle goes on to note that illegals who try to break Mexican immigration law are treated horribly. They can basically be shot for crossing the border.

Considering the above details, can you say that the Arizona law is overly harsh? Of course not. Right now the Federal Govt already has laws on the books enacted during the Reagan era that they refuse to follow. A nation without laws or borders is not nation.

DreadPirateRoberts

Get ready for “Obamnesty”

Few knew that we were racially profiling innocent job workers as they came across the Southern border of the United States, but we apparently were. The fact that many Mexicans look alike, wear similar clothes, and universally seem unable speak English being used as factors mere feet from the U.S. border should not be allowed, or at least that is what we are being told.

What is the limit? A mile, five, one-hundred? At what point does the assertion that a person acts, speaks, and looks like an illegal alien become “racial profiling”? If you ask a person for their green card mere feet from the border couldn’t this also be a slur against their civil rights?

In the world of Barack Obama, it seems the goal is to never be able to ask for identification of national identity. Why? Because he needs the voters to finish the job he has started to fundamentally destroy the American way.

Think about it, did you ever think you would see large groups of obvious illegals shouting about their “Right” to free healthcare, jobs, schooling, and residency? Could it happen in Mexico? Of course not, they have borders there they defend, and arrest people who violate them.

Did you ever think that Mexico’s President would comment about Arizona state law? This recently happened when Felipe Calderon said that Arizona’s law would cause more “hate”. My question to Mr Calderon would be, “By whom?”.

After all, it isn’t American citizens who are smearing refried beans on the windows of state buildings in the shape of a swastika. It isn’t Mexican ranchers who are being murdered by Americans streaming across their border.

Ignoring borders and allowing uncontrolled immigration is what destroys nations. It destroys culture. And when a nation is no longer unified in a way where it’s citizens see themselves as part of that nation, then they can easily revolt against that country.

If you talk to many illegals, they hold no great regard for the United States, in fact many say our country is not as good as their own. Why come here? Not Freedom, but free-things: Free benefits.

Barack Obama wants open borders. Open borders mean a never ending stream of Democrat (Socialist) voters. Who loses in this scenario? Anyone who currently is an American citizen. Our lives, our country, and our children’s future will be squandered to enrich the world’s poor. And it is happening without our concent, but by the illegals who are coming here, and the Govt that wants them to gift them with power.

Arizona’s law is doing what the Federal law already has the ability and requirement to do, but isn’t. It is simply allowing State troopers and police officers to identify and detain illegal immigrants for the very act of breaking our nations laws.

If we don’t stop this, in 40 years we will not longer be the “United” States, but an amalgam of fighting international invaders intent on divying up the remainder of our nations resources.

DreadPirateRoberts

They are the poison, we are the cure

Wow, this is pretty enlightening. Bertha Lewis, ACORN CEO, speaking to the Young Democratic Socialists, makes it pretty clear what she thinks of the Tea Party:

“This rise of this Tea Party so-called movement — bowel movement in my estimation — and this blatant uncovering and ripping off the mask of racism.”

And it should not be surprising that this woman considers herself a Socialist, because she says she is:

“Any group that says, ‘I’m young, I’m Democratic, and I’m a socialist,’ is all right with me. You know that’s no light thing to do — to actually say, I’m a socialist – because you guys know right now we are living in a time which is going to dwarf the McCarthy era. It is going to dwarf the internment during World War II. We are right now in a time that is going to dwarf the era of Jim Crow and segregation,”

Hmm, wow. Do we need to remind us that ACORN is the former employer of Barack Obama? Or that the Democratic Socialist Party endorsed the now President when he ran for office in Illinois?

It is hard to wallow with pigs and not get dirty, in my opinion.

I laughed when I heard Bertha Lewis saying that the Tea Party is a “bowel movement” because she gets it all wrong. We are fiber, the bowel movement is going to come in 2010 and in 2012.

Lewis’ hyperbolic statements are simple fear-mongering. We do not wish to send anyone to internment camps, we just don’t want to end up in those camps ourselves. The Left, in it’s vitreol, would leap at the chance to strip American rights if it gave them a chance at total power and control.

The Tea Party believes in Freedom, and that includes Ms. Lewis’ refreshing honesty. If Barack Obama was as truthful, he would not be President today.

DreadPirateRoberts

Buy a truck, get an AK-47

Another CNN reporter “owned” by a Conservative business man.

It is pretty hilarious how the reporter seems to ponder why anyone would need an AK 47. That is not the point, people have the right to own one if they wish. Further, if an advertisement for an auto dealership offends your sensibilities, then don’t buy a car from them.

This video really defines the Liberal mentality well, and reflects it upon what the average American believes. Basically, to the CNN reporter, there are a few “truths” which she feels are basic, but are actually Liberal baloney of the highest order:

AK 47s, being an “ugly gun” are not needed in our society.

The AK 47 is probably the most popular gun in the world. It is highly reliable, and can work with little lubrication, in the sand and mud, ect. It is also an effective deer rifle. The Maxmotors representative makes a great point about how 2 people and their foster children were attacked and killed with firearms that were likely illegal, as they may have been fully automatic. AK 47s sold in the US are not fully automatic. I am not saying that an AK would be my first choice for home defense, but it certainly would work as one.

The use of “God” in an advertisement.

I wonder if this woman actually thinks that any reference to God, be it Jesus, Buddha, Allah, ect. is illegal to use or in some way offensive. Again, if the people that buy trucks and cars object to this, they will not buy from Maxmotors. But it seems to be working for them.

The use of “American” in an advertisement.

Yep, we have gotten to the point in Obama’s America…oops, I mean in Obama’s “equal world entity” where the use of the word “America” is not longer politically correct. You can see who these CNN people voted for, and at the same time they think we are stupid enough not to notice.

Personally, I could care less if someone used “satan” in an ad for a blender. I just wouldn’t buy that product if it offended me. To the Left, words that they disagree with need to be banned, and the mere mention of a gun eradicated from society.

DreadPirateRoberts

Britain’s Obama claims his country deluded over defeating Nazis

Youtube clip: Nick Clegg, who seems to be running much as Barack Obama did in 2009, at “The Wave” Climate change (Global Warming) march, talks about radical change and embraces the Socialist party in the crowd. He then demonizes “Climate Change deniers” including American Republicans.

I have a warning for Britain: Take the statements of Clegg to heart and know that any radical expression is his true belief. The United States voter made a huge mistake in ignoring our current President’s radical ties and statements, and we are paying for it now.

Clegg recently made some statements that have Brits angered, and rightfully so. While he has tried to depict himself as the “new Churchill” Clegg recently said that Brits have a “more insidious cross to bear” than Nazi Germany in WW2.

Oh really? Was it Britain that tried to conquer Europe? Was it Britain that attempted to slaughter Jews?

Clegg went on, foolishly, to say that the British people had “Delusions of grandeur” and a “misplaced sense of superiority” over having defeated Nazi Germany. What exactly is Clegg talking about?

Nick Clegg seems to be a globalist, and not in a good way. To him, it is not about free trade, it is about a belief that no nation has the right to consider itself to have greater moral authority than another. No crime against society or the world is greater than this, he thinks. Not Naziism, not slavery or female genital mutilation, not Islamofascism. To the Cleggs and Obamas of the world, tyrants and dictators are just another group to embrace and hope for the best.

Just as President Obama dislikes to think of America as a great nation, or Americans as great people, Clegg secretly despises the idea of British greatness. Were he alive during the time of Churchill, he would oppose him.

In the World view of the new Marxist, one never fully admits the true goal of a world governed by a mish-mash of rogue bullies and pathetic Libertarians who accept their neighbors intrusion and thuggery. In the end, this type thinks that everything will work out well, as long as trillions of dollars/pounds are committed to foolish taxation and spending schemes which support ridiculous ideas such as global warming to “feel like good people”.

Mr Clegg wants a Leftist govt that pretends to be Democratic, and at the same time diminishes it’s goodness to prop up the egos of the world’s bottom feeders.

Nick Clegg is Winston Churchill? Mr Clegg, we remember Churchill, we honor Churchill, and you are no Churchill.

DreadPirateRoberts

Ed Schultz, poltroon

It seems that Ed did not like a Democrat Tea Party member calling his show to tell him why he is a member of the movement. So why DO members of the Left get so defensive when faced with the truth?

I guess it is a little like the movie, “Liar, Liar”. People often do not want to hear the truth. And the truth about Liberal ideology has been pretty clear for quite some time–it is destructive to any nation.

As time goes on the Left is getting more and more shrill. Their rhetoric is getting more and more ridiculous. “The Tea Party killed Jimmy Hoffa!! The Teabaggers step on cute puppies!!” It is what happens when people don’t like you–they start to ignore you. And how do they respond to this? By screaming louder.

Ed Schultz seems to be in competition at MSNBC to be the whackiest moonbat. The problem is that he has some very strong competition.

Personally, I don’t hate Ed or his kind, although I am sure he would not say the same about me. I pity him. I know that perhaps pity should be reserved for people who are not trying to actively destroy our nation, but I can’t help it. The guy is a sad and angry person.

The more that the Tea Party does not fit into their mold, the louder the Left with become. The Tea Party refuses to become what they are, and this confuses them. Liberal protest has long been a violent and messsy thing; People who attend these protests often do not understand or care about the “big picture” or know enough to form a cogent argument. They just get on the bus, both figuratively and physically, and do what the Democratic Party tells them to do.

This is why they cannot understand us, because we are not driven by hatred, but rather by a goal of returning our country to what it once was. And this is counter to the progressive goal of Socialism where parasites eat away at a nations core until it collapses.

DreadPirateRoberts

The Left’s new slur: “Tea Klanners”

Holding signs that say, “New shape, same hate”, Lefty protesters try a new tactic to try to demonize the Tea Party. But as usual, it is bound to fail miserably.

The reason for the assertion that the Tea Party has any association to the KKK is pretty clear, because the KKK was actually an arm of the Democratic Party much as ACORN is today. But the Democrats would like you to forget that fact.

Dr Eric Foner wrote about this in his book, “A Short History of Reconstruction” in 1990. And to bolster his credibility even further (since many Democrats deny the roots of the KKK), Foner is a liberal and also a professsor at Columbia University.

Racism, the KKK, and tradition Democratic voting were all traditions that carried on from generation to generation, as is noted by the statement by KKK Grand Dragon Nathan Bedford Forrest:

“I have never voted for any man who was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat…. My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic party.”

In his book, Dr Foner details the origins of the KKK, and it’s true purpose, which was basically to terrorize and kill white and black Republicans:

“Founded in 1866 as a Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders black and white.”

What can be learned about the KKK and the Democratic party is that the ties of radicalism run deep in the power structure of the party itself. To the leadership of the party, this radicalism is to be used to undermine and destroy their enemies. And if their “radical arm” becomes discredited, the party lives on. They just disband, rename, and form a new radical “limb” to rip and tear at their enemies. In the end, their enemy is the American people.

As the KKK fell from favor via it’s horrible actions, the Democrats suddenly said they were “anti-racism” but at the same time electing people like Robert Byrd, (former?) Klansman, to the US Senate. The party then moved on to embrace the Leftist radicals of the 60s, such s the Black Panthers, and groups like the “Weather Underground” which spawned radicals like Barack Obama’s “friend and neighbor” William Ayers. Ayers, who attempted actual attacks on America ala Timothy McVeigh, was not only not demonized, he was glorified and enriched by his Democrat roots.

ACORN came next, and as we know, helped to elect many Democratic candidates via stuffing the ballot boxes in many races, while using “volunteers” to provide false names and dead folks to provide a “means to an end” and we know that end was Democrat power.

Now that ACORN has been discredited due to some very shrude videos by two young Conservatives and Andrew Breitbart, they are supposedly “disbanding”. But are they gone? No, they will simply rename and come back in their next virulent form.

My prediction is that the Left already has it’s next radical group lined up, and that is radical Latino groups aligned with Communism. We saw this during the last press for Amnesty by President Bush. Remember the “May Day” rally of thousands of Mexican illegals holding Mexican and Communist flags?

To the Democrats, radicalism is a tool. We can only point out that fact to America and let them decide if the Democratic party is one they would like to rule their lives.

DreadPirateRoberts.