Youtube clip: The time for talk is over, over, over, over….
I think it is time for us to shut these people down. If this Congress was controlled by Republicans, we would have already heard the shouts of “Do-nothing Congress” and “Culture of corruption”. But since the media has their party in control and is implementing their plan of implosion, we don’t hear anything.
I guess the job is up to us. We need to exclaim at every turn that we want Congress to “get back to the work of Governing”. Let’s face it, these people have done almost nothing but debate how they will take over our nation for over a year. They make deadline after deadline, then say that it is too important to stop.
The clock is ticking on their control on power. Their poll numbers continue to sink as even former Obots and Democrats see the truth. The truth is that this has nothing to do with making our country better–it is about control.
During the Clinton era we saw a different mentality. President Bill Clinton was smart enough to switch gears when he had to. His one mistake was allowing his ideological wife push a pretty radical agenda in the first two years of his Presidency. But in no way was Bill Clinton was steeped in Marxism as this current lot.
The Democratic party is no longer the Democratic party. They are the American Socialist party of old. To the disgust of Conservatives, and the help of Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, the Republican party has become the old Democratic party. It is up to us to move them back to reality. And we must do this by the force of our Philosophy, voice, and vote.
This “do-nothing Congress” is dangerous. They are looking for ways to irreversably transform the greatest nation on Earth into a culturally fractured, grotesque paper tiger. Their views of our nation is that it is corrupt, but they are the true corruptors. They talk about jobs, but relish a nation of jobless slaves. They talk about fiscal competancy, but spend money that we may never have. Their goal is transitional Marxism, and the end goal we cannot even fathom.
We must stand atop the mountain and shout the truth. We know how great America is, and we will not waver on it’s true nature.
“Talker in Chief” may be giving him (Obama) more praise than he deserves. Reagon was “the great communicator”, and then the press tried to give the title to Clinton. No thanks. Apparently, they were too young to hear Reagon or more likely just wouldn’t listen with honest ears, and never read Lincoln. Communication involves sincerity, ethics and content combined with honest and artful linguistic structure. Clinton, well, he fell short. He was manipulative. His words didn’t match his face, his heart not in his voice. Discernment made you uneasy. He was going to take you someplace rather than just have you come along with him. Comunication does that. “I’m going out to clear the pasture spring. I shan’t be gone long, you come, too.” (Frost)
And, then there’s Obama, a mere VOCALIZER. An empty vocal vessel filled with words shaped into deceit, echoing with hopeless, changeless repetition. A vocalizer borrowing from everybody hoping to persuade somebody. The press embarasses itself with its oowing and aahing over his collection of three word phrases of beltway telaprompter-ese. How can I put it elegantly… Give me a break!
I agree, Ed. The most powerful tool of a speaker is believing what they say. Reagan had a great ability because he was telling Americans what he believed, and he did so from his heart. Because of this, Americans were comforted, because they believed he had our best interests at heart.
Clinton was a great speaker, but basically because he was an accomplished liar. What is remarkable is that both Clinton and Reagan grew up in a household with an alcoholic father. It is said that under such horrible conditions a child will grow up in one of two ways: Either he will become a “pleaser at any cost” (Clinton) or a strong “believer in self” (Reagan). So basically Clinton grew up saying and behaving in ways to please others. He could easily say, “I feel your pain” and people would believe him not because of his true beliefs, but because he was a lifelong pleaser and manipulator.
Obama is another case. He is a lifelong radical of the Alinsky mold. It is his indoctrinated beliefs that drive him, and he believes the simple fact that he exists and can provide soaring rhetoric will win him all the support he needs on any subject. Why? Because it worked his whole life. He would ordinarily be considered a mediocre choice for any position, but because of his position racially, he is considered “A new breed of politician”, which he is not. He is an old thinker of Marx. Progressivism is simply the application of tried but not trued Socialist concepts that have never worked. Obama believe it because he is told that a “golden child” would come forth and would make people finally understand. But when they do not understand, said Golden child becomes a very annoyed and dismissive idol, as seen recently.
Northernlibertyalliance's Blog 
Hey this is a great blog post. I agree totally
Thanks, Jerry. Come back often and comment, your opinion is important.
This CREEP never just shuts UP!
“Talker in Chief” may be giving him (Obama) more praise than he deserves. Reagon was “the great communicator”, and then the press tried to give the title to Clinton. No thanks. Apparently, they were too young to hear Reagon or more likely just wouldn’t listen with honest ears, and never read Lincoln. Communication involves sincerity, ethics and content combined with honest and artful linguistic structure. Clinton, well, he fell short. He was manipulative. His words didn’t match his face, his heart not in his voice. Discernment made you uneasy. He was going to take you someplace rather than just have you come along with him. Comunication does that. “I’m going out to clear the pasture spring. I shan’t be gone long, you come, too.” (Frost)
And, then there’s Obama, a mere VOCALIZER. An empty vocal vessel filled with words shaped into deceit, echoing with hopeless, changeless repetition. A vocalizer borrowing from everybody hoping to persuade somebody. The press embarasses itself with its oowing and aahing over his collection of three word phrases of beltway telaprompter-ese. How can I put it elegantly… Give me a break!
I agree, Ed. The most powerful tool of a speaker is believing what they say. Reagan had a great ability because he was telling Americans what he believed, and he did so from his heart. Because of this, Americans were comforted, because they believed he had our best interests at heart.
Clinton was a great speaker, but basically because he was an accomplished liar. What is remarkable is that both Clinton and Reagan grew up in a household with an alcoholic father. It is said that under such horrible conditions a child will grow up in one of two ways: Either he will become a “pleaser at any cost” (Clinton) or a strong “believer in self” (Reagan). So basically Clinton grew up saying and behaving in ways to please others. He could easily say, “I feel your pain” and people would believe him not because of his true beliefs, but because he was a lifelong pleaser and manipulator.
Obama is another case. He is a lifelong radical of the Alinsky mold. It is his indoctrinated beliefs that drive him, and he believes the simple fact that he exists and can provide soaring rhetoric will win him all the support he needs on any subject. Why? Because it worked his whole life. He would ordinarily be considered a mediocre choice for any position, but because of his position racially, he is considered “A new breed of politician”, which he is not. He is an old thinker of Marx. Progressivism is simply the application of tried but not trued Socialist concepts that have never worked. Obama believe it because he is told that a “golden child” would come forth and would make people finally understand. But when they do not understand, said Golden child becomes a very annoyed and dismissive idol, as seen recently.